11 January 2018

Walk into the ocean and keep on walking (if you love your life)!

What do people feel, see, or think when, preferably - or mostly per the worship leader’s directive – while standing, with eyes closed, arms in the air and slowly swaying on the music’s rhythm, sing “Take me deeper than my feet could ever wander, and my faith will be made stronger”?

The song is versed in the context and image of a lot of water and some serious waves agitating its surface. So we’re talking about a serious volume of water, not to be confused with an average ornamental pond that one might encounter in some backyards.

In my mind I see myself walking into the ocean until the water reaches my lips. The west wind (force 6-7)  pushes up the short and fierce waves. In between each two waves I quickly breathe, panic slowly building up but, through some serious effort and positive self-talk, I maintain this “I’m alright” poise. Heartbeats per minute now over 150. This already is quite frightening let alone when I decide to keep on walking. Keep going. Be brave and just let go for where you lose the ground under your feet the Lord finally gets an opportunity to carry you.

Maybe it’s a contemporary and Christian application of the awfull generalisation “no pain, no gain,” an expression that is used to comfort and encourage those that suffer from (mostly) self-inflicted pain, with the hope and expectation to come out at the other end of that pain more beautiful and attractive. Some factions within theology have adopted No pain, No gain, as truth; we only grow and change after having gone through some serious pain and misfortune,  and buttress it with some cut out from its context Scripture.[1]

AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam
Whenever this song is sung (very often) I cannot help but see the image of a desperate father and/or mother having to give up their child to death as a result of some horrible disease, malnutrition or whatever cursed cause.
Or I see a, for whatever reason tormented soul that wonders how much longer it can cope with life, barely standing up straight there where the water meets the sand.

It just doesn’t sync with my experience of the (greater) reality that we’re part of in this world. I can’t say, nor sing these words and instead will use it as an opportunity to quietly pray for all those that can’t hum or sing along as their pain is to great or their questions to big.

No, it’s a typical song that is sung by a reasonably affluent audience out of the plush of the comfortable theatre seat. Well fed, (almost) all ducks in life’s row and yet slightly unhappy with their spiritual state of mind and soul. There’s got to be more; maybe the depth of the sea will have the answer and will finally get me what I’m after.

This kind of depth, as advocated in the song, we don’t have to deliberately seek or ask for. It happens upon us as an unwelcome, malignant intruder. Some don’t and won’t survive these depths. It’s not their or God’s fault. It happens.
May God have and show mercy on all those that find themselves involuntarily in those depths.

In response to Oceans, Hillsong United. Here a link to an especially spectacular beautiful  version (I love a good piece of music and that’s what this). Pay attention to the smooth sliding chords and the build up to the climax.



[1] For instance 1 Peter 1:6-7  In all this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while you may have had to suffer grief in all kinds of trials. 7 These have come so that the proven genuineness of your faith—of greater worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire—may result in praise, glory and honor when Jesus Christ is revealed.
Or
Isiah 43:2 When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and when you pass through the rivers, they will not sweep over you. When you walk through the fire, you will not be burned; the flames will not set you ablaze.

08 January 2018

Did the snake in Genesis drink coffee or just showed off the cup?

Continuation from the previous blog

So, in 1926 reverend Geelkerken, together with some of his colleagues, was evicted from office. Allegedly he’d proposed in a sermon that the snake in Genesis 3 hadn’t literally spoken. One elder who’d filed an official complaint which was officially invalidated by the synod, could not accept the synods verdict and stubbornly stuck his heels in the sand (maybe a Dutch thing) which resulted in the massive church split.
Depiction of the sin of Adam and Eve by
Jan Brueghel the Elder and Pieter Paul Ruben
s (Created in 1615)
In his defense Geelkerken wrote that, for instance, it is hard to explain the particulars of Genesis 3. He pointed out that there are as many interpretations as there are interpreters," and added the following sentence: “just take the tree of knowledge of good and evil, the talking snake, the tree of life etc.” Moreover he subsequently admonished the congregation not to be bemused by this and called the fall a historical fact.[1]

The most effective way to communicate and pass on core truths to a next generation is through stories. A story is easy to remember and is a relatively safe packaging methods to safeguard the conservation of the core truth it contains.

What Christians call sin is the elementary belief that man chooses to live without God, preferring to live life independent from Him. Genesis 3 conveys how this severance-drama unfolds. What we need to focus on is the nature of sin and its consequence for the relationship between God and man, man and man, and man and the environment. When one loses himself in a discussion focusing on “did versus did not” pertaining to the actual story, one misses the point, with hot heads, splits and foolish conclusions as a result. Why is it that one is so easily lured into engaging in discussions regarding containers where it’s really about what is in the container? 

And let’s face it; the story of Genesis is being told and retold over and over again, using analogies, images and words that are relevant and make sense to the contemporary audience. The reason we modernize the story is because we know that it is about what needs to be communicated and understood and not about the packaging.

When I attended lectures in India for my studies, a Canadian professor told the class about a Bollywood movie that had made quite an impression on him. He gave the class the summary and asked if one of the approximately 50 Indian students would might have any idea which film he was talking about. The whole class responded with sheer laughter and told him that the movie he was describing could have been any Bollywood movie as “they’re all the same”. The only difference are the actors, the scenery, the run-up to the betrayal and the eventual reconciliation. 

In February 1968 a reconciliation service was held in Amsterdam. The purpose of the service was to exonerate reverend Geelkerken and to revoke the Asser statements. Reverend Geelkerken didn’t live to see, witness and experience it in person. He died in 1960, posthumously exonerated.

The synod had come to its senses as they realized it was about the coffee and not about the wrapping.